About Us

Founded in 1962, the Civic League For New Castle County is an organization comprised of community civic associations, umbrella civic groups, good government groups, businesses, and interested individuals. The League provides a forum for education about, discussion of, and action on issues relating to the impact of government on the quality of life in New Castle County

Monday, September 15, 2014

CLNCC 2014 Candidates' Forum 6:30PM Tomorrow Night - Participants and Schedule of Events

 
 
Schedule of Events


6:30-6:40 Attorney General Introductory Remarks
THEDODORE A. KITTILA - R
CATHERINE DAMAVANDI - G
 
6:40-7:00 STATE REP DIS 3
HELENE M  KEELEY - D 
ROBERT I BOVELL JR - R

7:00-7:20 STATE REP DIS 4 
ROBERT KEESLER  - R
GERALD L BRADY  - D

7:20-7:40 STATE REP DIS 9 

DOUGLAS A CAMPBELL JR  - IOD
KEVIN HENSLEY - R

7:40-8:10 STATE REP DIS 21 

MICHAEL RAMONE - R 
DAVID A  MCCORQUODALE - G

8:10-8:30 STATE REP DIS 22 

JOHN MACKENZIE - D
STEVEN NEWTON - L

 
8:30 - 9  MIXED PANEL

STATE SEN DIS 4
SARAH L BUTTNER - D 

STATE SEN DIS 10
JOHN MARINO - R

STATE REP DIS 2 
STEPHANIE BOLDEN - D

STATE REP DIS 6
KYLE BUZZARD - R

STATE REP DIS 7 
ROBERT WILSON - L

STATE REP DIS 12 
JEFFRY PORTER - D 

STATE REP DIS 15
MATTHEW LENZINI - R

STATE REP DIS 19 
JAMES STARTZMAN - R


Sunday, September 7, 2014

CLNCC General Election Candidates Forum 6:30PM Tuesday September 16th At Cranston Heights Fire Company



The Civic League for New Castle County will be holding its General Election Candidates Forum 6:30PM Tuesday September 16th at the Cranston Heights Fire Company at Prices Corner.

All candidates for New Castle County's General Assembly races have been invited.

~*~

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Watch The New Castle County Council 3rd District Debate!


CLNCC Videos are up!

New Castle County Council 3rd District in Delaware with incumbent Janet Kilpatrick (R) and primary challenger Michael Protack (R) September 2, 2014 Civic League for New Castle County 2014 Primary Candidates Forum Cosponsored with Greater Hockessin Area Development Assoc. and  Pike Creek Valley Civic League

Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80BqST44olE&index=1&list=PLI3uGLGU8U7B2M4j4aWTyc_PcwCD_T8Gb

Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ff6y6A4ZoYc&list=UUTX9ekbofZSAFkAy7OuLaMQ




Tuesday, August 19, 2014

3rd District NCC Council And 22nd State Rep.Candidates' Debate Set For 6:30 Sept. 2nd In Hockessin!

Update: State House candidates will begin at 6:30 and New Castle County candidates at 7:40PM.

Hockessin Community News Editor Ben Mace Will Moderate The Debate For 3rd Council And 22nd House Races 6:30PM Tuesday

The Civic League for New Castle County, the Greater Hockessin Area Development Association, along with the Pike Creek Valley Civic League, are hosting a candidates' debate on Tuesday, Sept. 2, at Hockessin Memorial Hall at 6:30 p.m. 
This year, there are two races that are of interest to residents the greater Hockessin and Pike Creek areas of New Castle County.
These are the County Council 3rd District with Incumbent Janet Kilpatrick (R) and primary challenger Michael Protack (R).
We also have the State Representative 22nd District with Incumbent Joe Miro (R) and primary challenger, Michael Smith (R) of which the winner will face John MacKenzie (D) and Steve Newton (L) in the November General Election.
For the 22nd representative race, we are inviting the declared and filed candidates for the Democrat and Libertarian Parties to participate alongside the Republican primary candidates.
The Civic League for New Castle County (CLNCC) and the Greater Hockessin Area Development Association (GHADA), along with the Pike Creek Valley Civic League (PCVCL) are sponsoring and hosting a debate on Sept. 2, at 6:30 p.m. to take place at the Hockessin Memorial Fire Hall located in downtown Hockessin on Lancaster Pike and Yorklyn Road.
We will have prepared questions available for the candidates and will be taking questions submitted in writing, from the floor, time permitting that evening that are submitted to the moderator panel.
The debate will be moderated by the Hockessin Community News editor Ben Mace. The basic format will be as follows:
6:30 - 7:35 p.m.: 22nd State Representative District
  • Opening Comments/Statement - 3 minutes each
  • Question and Answer Session - 40-45 minutes
  • Candidate's Closing Statement - 3 minutes each
 7:40 - 8:30 p.m.: 3rd County Council District
  • Opening Comments/Statement - 3 minutes each
  • Question and Answer Session - 30-35 minutes
  • Candidate's Closing Statement - 3 minutes each 
There will be strict adherence to time limits so as to keep things moving along smoothly and to afford all candidates equal time to speak and address questions. We believe in civility and courtesy and in having a productive, educational and informative debates.





Save the date!
 
September 2, 2014

 
6:30 - 7:12PM
 
3rd Council District
 
Janet Kilpatrick (R incumbent)
 
Mike Protack (R)
 
 
 
And 7:15 - 8:20PM
 
22nd Representative District
 
 Joe Miro (R incumbent)
 
Michael Smith (R)
 
John MacKenzie (D)
 
Steve Newton (L)

Also plan to come to the

Civic League for New Castle County 
2014 Candidates Forum


September 16, 2014 6:30-9:00 pm.

Paul J. Sweeney Public Safety Building 3601 N. DuPont Highway New Castle, DE 19720
 


Monday, August 11, 2014

Toll Brothers' Appeal Of County-Denied Traffic Impact Study Is Set For 6PM Thursday - NCC Board Of Adjustment

(image)

A friend called and warned that this Toll Brothers appeal Thursday is a very big deal for the future of control over development in New Castle County.

From the August 2014 New Castle County Council Third District newsletter ~

Former Hercules/Delaware National Golf Course property to go before the New Castle County Board of Adjustment
In 2010, a land use application was submitted to develop the remaining portion of the former Hercules/Delaware National Golf Course on Lancaster Pike. According the New Castle County Code, applicants have three years to record a plan or it expires. While the applicant was proceeding through the land use process, they were unable to obtain approval of their Traffic Impact Study by the Land Use Department. As such, their plan expired as Traffic Impact Study approval is required to proceed to record plan stage and without it, the three year timeframe, and all allowing timeframe extensions, were exhausted. 
The applicant has decided to appeal the Land Use Department's decision that the application has expired and that the Traffic Impact Study is not acceptable to the County's Board of Adjustment. This hearing will take place Thursday August 14, 2014 at 6:00 pm in the County Building, 87 Reads Way, New Castle. The County will defend its position that the plan is expired and that the Traffic Impact Study is unacceptable at this hearing. This hearing is open to the public, should you wish to attend.
For some reason the newsletter (sent out by Janet Kilpatrick's aide) neglects to name the applicant. It's Toll Brothers. And county land use documents show that Toll is being represented by John Tracey of YCST and that Greg Pettinaro represents Delaware National's interests.




I found a lot of useful background information about the appeal on the Little Falls Village facebook site (note: the appeal was postponed from June 26th to this Thursday, August 14th).

From Little Falls Village ~
Toll Brothers, Inc. is appealing the January 7 Department of Land Use final decision disapproval letter, but we don't know what specifics they will offer until the public hearing. Presumably, they will offer specific changes to their plan to address the specific objections in the disapproval letter, but there were two pages of specifics in that letter ... that's a lot of detail to cover at a public hearing!
They have posted the NCC Land Use Department letter ~


This is the final decision from the Department of Land Use (DoLU) that is being ...appealed at a public hearing on June 26. Note that a DoLU procedure entitled the applicant to file an appeal within 20 working days from the date of this letter. Presumably they did, which resulted in the scheduling of the public hearing. Much of this letter is incomprehensible to lay persons, but after two pages of detailed specifics the conclusion is obvious ... without an acceptable Traffic Impact Study there will be “unacceptable level(s) of service ... on (m)any roadway segment(s) or intersection(s)” within the project’s “area of influence”. A number of roadways and intersections in our immediate area are described ... Little Falls Village residents will recognize them and their problems as we cope with them daily. Because of the inadequacy of the submitted TIS, the applicant's Record Plan submission expired and the applicant's $64,860.00 Record Plan review fee was refunded. See More
Also see ~
The four parcels of land include substantially all that remains of the former Hercules Country Club golf course that has not already been carved out for Little Falls Village, Centerville Point and other parcels such as the stone mansion fronting on Lancaster Pike. That includes the former fairways east of Penn Oak Drive, surrounding Little Falls Village west and south of Beaver Falls Place, across the Red Clay Creek and on both sides of Hercules Road ... over 200 acres covers a lot of ground ... pardon the pun!

The effects on Little Falls Village come from the deterioration of nearby roads and intersections and excessive traffic as described in the above letter rather than direct impact on our neighborhood. Our neighbors presumably understand and expect that Little Falls Village will eventually be surrounded by 'McMansions' similar to what Toll Brothers are building in "Greenville Overlook". They may be large, they may be garish and they certainly are inefficient and unjustifiable for all but the largest families, but most of all ... McMansions are expensive ... and it would be a good thing for property values in Little Falls Village to be immediately adjacent to more expensive properties.

So, if the issues of roads, intersections and traffic can be resolved without transferring the costs to the taxpayers, the effects on Little Falls Village are positive ... in the long-term. Until then, we must deal with inadequate roads and intersections, too much traffic and the temporary inconvenience of construction while McMansions are built around us.
  
Here are URL's for the tax parcels ... each links to a map view:
http://www3.nccde.org/parcel/details/default.aspx...
http://www3.nccde.org/parcel/details/default.aspx...
http://www3.nccde.org/parcel/details/default.aspx...
http://www3.nccde.org/parcel/details/default.aspx...


It seems unlikely that the applicant has a chance of overturning the disapproval. What new information could they present since their original application? It seems they are exhausting every option ... spending another $3,000 for a non-refundable application to the Board of Adjustment to appeal the disapproval:
http://www3.nccde.org/Project/Details/Default.aspx...

Delaware National Development Plan

This is old information and obsolete information, but it is interesting information. This was the original proposal for the development of 200+ acres of land surrounding Little Falls Village and Centerville Point ... 260+ residences of various types. Residents of Little Falls Village may remember our battle in the early years of this decade to keep the developers from using our neighborhood as a "run through" which resulted in legislative action to maintain our integrity as a neighborhood. Nonetheless, 260+ residences will be an enormous impact on the surrounding roads and intersections ... especially Lancaster Pike at the intersection with Hercules Road and Centerville Road and Centerville Road at the intersection with Red Clay Drive, which is our only access ... not to mention surrounding our neighborhood with McMansions that we must tolerate for their positive impact on our resale values. This plan is what was rejected as inadequate and that rejection will be appealed at a public hearing on June 26 August 14.

And for good measure, here's a link to the 2006 lawsuit Toll filed against DelDOT in Chancery Court objecting to Bond Bill epilogue language instructing DelDOT to purchase Delaware National property to prevent development ~ COURT OF CHANCERY - Justia

And (Community News) Grace Lo Porto reported in 2010 ~
Dozens of residents living near Delaware National Golf Course expressed concern Tuesday over plans to build a 264-home community there.  The project, still in the early planning stages, would involve current owner Pettinaro selling the property to Toll Brothers Inc., who would build the community.  Toll Brothers is already building Greenville Overlook on an adjacent parcel that once was part of the golf course.  A major sticking point with residents is traffic.........Toll Brothers Division President Jeffrey Bartos spoke at length at the meeting. In response to traffic concerns, he said a Traffic Impact Study would be required before approval.  Asked if Toll Brothers would stop development if the study yielded unfavorable results, Bartos said no, the company would instead improve the intersections that had an unfavorable rating and continue with development.   
A second issue centered on the belief that toxic chemicals from the former Hercules Research Center have contaminated the site. According to Hale, there are rumors that Agent Orange was developed at the facility. The research facility was knocked down about two years ago; the area is now vacant, though still fenced in.  Dr. Randall Detra, Associate Professor of Science and Technology at Neumann University, also commented on the facility.  “I’ve seen vapor releases [from the facility] that kill large areas of vegetation and even two-story trees,” he said. “One thing about the [research] site is that they say it’s safe because there’s very little…people around, and that’s going to change if you start building.”   
Other community organizations, such as the Milltown Limestone Civic Alliance (MLCA), have expressed concerns about the pesticides that have been used on the property, and the high levels of chemicals like arsenic that resulted. Bartos has stated that Toll Brothers will be doing a cleanup of pesticide residue at the site similar to what was done at Greenville Overlook. Toll Brothers began a cleanup of contaminated soil there in last September and completed it in November.  Bartos said it was in the company’s best interest to make sure the site was completely safe.  “As a publicly-traded homebuilder, the cardinal rule is ‘Thou shalt not make mistakes,’” he said.
~*~

The Civic League For New Castle County Is Planning A Candidate Forum For September 16, 2014!

Keep an eye out for more information on the Civic League's September Candidate's Forum!

Unfortunately this will be after the September 9th primary, so we won't have a chance to hear from all of the area's candidates before then.

The forum is set for our regular third Tuesday monthly meeting at the Public Safety Building on Rte. 13.

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Civic League for New Castle County Monthly Meeting 7PM Tonight

 


Civic League for New Castle County
Meeting Agenda
July 15, 2014 at 7:00 PM
Sweeney Public Safety Building
3601 N. DuPont Highway New Castle, DE 19


Meeting Agenda

- Officers Report

- Treasurer’s Report

- September 2014 Candidates Forum Discussion (Offices, CL Volunteers for event)
New Items and Updates
- Fort du Pont Redevelopment Corp. - Weymouth  
- Briefing on Advocacy Process - Against Proposed UDel / Newark Power Plant -Data Center - Willing  
- Where Will They Park Update - Whitehead 
-  TID / MOA /  TIS - Whitehead  
- Legeslative Session Comments  
- Brief updates from members on guest to alert others to any issues or problems. 
- Additional Community Updates and Issues 
- Other Items 

2014 Meeting Dates 
7PM on the Third Tuesdays of the month  
3601 N. DuPont Highway New Castle, DE 19720

15th July 
16th September 2014 
21st October 2014 
18th November 2014
President 
Charles C Stirk Jr.

Vice President
Mark Blake

Vice President
Jordyn Pusey

Treasurer
Scot Sauer

Secretary
Christine Whitehead
 
 

Thursday, June 26, 2014

MEET THE CIVIC LEAGUE FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY'S NEW LEADERSHIP!

The CLNCC June 2014 Elections results!

CIVIC LEAGUE FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

President 

Charles C Stirk Jr

Vice President

Mark Blake

Vice President

Jordyn Pusey

Treasurer

Scot Sauer

Secretary

Christine Whitehead
 
 

HB 418 - AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 30 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO STATE TAXES AND VESSEL-TO-VESSEL TRANSFERS OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.

More details on HB 418 from Vic Singer -

<> WHAT HB 418 PROPOSES TO DO: HB 418 proposes a new tax consisting of a fee of $1 per barrel upon any entity engaged in commercial lightering within Delaware's territorial jurisdiction.
.
<> WHO ARE THE SPONSORS? HB 418 was filed by Rep. Edward Osienski (D, 24th District). Joint sponsors and/or cosponsors are Senator Karen Peterson (D, 9th District), Michael Barbieri (D, 18th District), Rep. Earl Jaques (D, 27th District) and Rep. John Kowalko (D, 27th District).
.
<> WHAT IS "LIGHTERING?" "Lightering" is off-loading cargo from deep draft ocean vessels to shallower draft vessels able to reach port facilities up the Delaware or other rivers. The two vessels must be kept close enough together for the petroleum to be transferred by heavy hoses stretched or draped across the gap that separates them. After enough cargo is off-loaded from the deep draft tanker to reduce its draft to what the channel depth will accommodate, the deep draft tanker can also go upstream to the delivery target.
.
<> WHY IS LIGHTERING IMPORTANT TO DELAWARE? Big Stone Anchorage is a Natural Resource entirely within Delaware's boundaries; the DE/NJ state line is a mile or more east of the Anchorage. The Anchorage is part of a 55 ft minimum depth (low tide) trench in the bottom of Delaware Bay that stretches from 7 to 17 miles northwest of Cape Henlopen. It is easily reached by deep draft tankers, and has been used for lightering petroleum for more than a half century.It is reputedly the only deep draft accessible sheltered inland bay between Maine and Texas.
.
<> CAN LIGHTERING BE DONE AT SEA? Lightering can be done at sea, but inland bays are preferred because sheltering from heavy seas and storms make the activity safer and less susceptible to demurrage fees incurred due to high seas and stormy weather.
.
<> WHAT IS A DEMURRAGE FEE? A demurrage fee is the charge that the user of seagoing vessel pays to the owner when the time required for loading, transporting and unloading the cargo exceeds what was provided for in the terms of the contract. It is analogous to the per day charge for renting a car.
.
<> IS BIG STONE ANCHORAGE COVERED BY DELAWARE'S COASTAL ZONE ACT? The Anchorage is subject to all of Delaware's laws, including the Coastal Zone Act. The CZA forbids bulk product transfers of materials delivered by sea. But one company that has been lightering continuously at the Anchorage since before the CZA was enacted is "grandfathered" to continue its non-conforming activity, though all expansions and extensions are subject to CZA conditions.
.
<> HOW MUCH PETROLEUM IS BEING LIGHTERED AT BIG STONE? DNREC reports that over 58 million barrels of crude were lightered at the Anchorage in CY 2013. But little or none went to the Delaware City Refinery because the refinery's Coastal Zone permit enables receiving more crude by rail than the refinery can use - - hence its planned exports to a sister refinery outside Delaware. The petroleum lightered at Big Stone goes to refineries in NJ, PA and other states on the eastern seaboard.
.
<> HOW MUCH GASOLINE DOES A BARREL PRODUCE? A barrel of crude produces as much as 29 gallons of gasoline plus higher molecular weight hydrocarbons and residual oil (separately marketable products).
.
<> UNDER THE HB 418 PROPOSAL, WHO PAYS? The "buck a barrel" proposal amounts to a tax less than 3.5 cents per gallon of gasoline derived from the lightered crude, but much less per gallon of the total amount shipped up river. All the lightered crude is sold to non-Delaware refineries, and only a fraction of it finds its way back to Delaware..
.
<> IS IT FAIR TO IMPOSE DELAWARE'S REVENUE NEEDS ON NON-DELAWAREANS? Fair or not, taxes imposed on businesses with revenues mostly from sales outside the State of Delaware account for more than $1 Billion - - more than 30% - - of Delaware's State budget. HB 418 represents only a small addition to our historic practice. And it is analogous to the separation charge imposed by most oil and Cnatural gas producing states on their resources sold for use by Delawareans.
.
<> IS THE PROPOSAL AN INTERFERENCE WITH INTERSTATE COMMERCE? Lightering at Big Stone Anchorage is a service started, performed and completed entirely within Delaware's boundaries. It is no more interstate commerce than the tax on a hotel room imposed on whoever rents it, or the toll on I-95 at the DE/MD State Line, or at the Delaware Memorial Bridges. Nor is it an interference with Maritime law, since the Anchorage is seven or more miles upstream from the mouth of the Delaware River.
 
 

SPONSOR:   
Rep. Osienski & Sen. Peterson
 
Reps. Barbieri, Jaques, Kowalko
 
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
147th GENERAL ASSEMBLY
 
HOUSE BILL NO. 418
 
 
AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 30 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO STATE TAXES AND VESSEL-TO-VESSEL TRANSFERS OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.


BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE (Three-fifths of all members elected to each house thereof concurring therein):


Section 1.  Amend §2901, Title 30 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows and redesignating accordingly:
(11) “Lightering” means the commercial transfer from one vessel to another vessel of any material in bulk quantities exceeding 40 barrels occurring upon waters within the territorial jurisdiction of this State and for the purpose of reducing the channel depth required for passage of either vessel.
Section 2.  Amend Chapter 29, Title 30 of the Delaware Code by adding a new “§ 2913” thereto by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows and redesignating accordingly:
§ 2913.  Petroleum product lightering service providers; license requirement; additional fee per unit lightered.
 (a)  Any person engaged in lightering of petroleum products shall first obtain a license from the Department of Finance and pay therefor a license fee of $75.  Such license shall be valid until January 1, at which time it may be renewed for a full year and every year thereafter, provided that the person makes application therefor and payment of $75 for renewal.
(b)  In addition to the license fee required by subsection (a) of this section, any person engaged in lightering of petroleum products shall pay a fee at the rate of $1 per barrel of petroleum product transferred, which fee shall be payable monthly on or before the twentieth day of each month with respect to the aggregate amount of petroleum products lightered during the immediately preceding month. The monthly returns shall be accompanied by a certified statement on such forms as the Department of Finance shall require in computing the fee due.
(c) The fees assessed pursuant to this section shall be remitted to the Department of Finance on forms issued by the Department, subject to such regulations and requirements prescribed by the Secretary of Finance.
(d) The Department of Finance shall pay over all fees received pursuant to this section to the Department of Transportation to the credit of the Transportation Trust Fund pursuant to Chapter 14 of Title 2.  Said fees shall be used to finance the costs of roads, highways and other transportation facilities and not to defray the expenses and obligations of the general government of the State.
Section 3.  This act shall take effect January 1, 2015.

SYNOPSIS

This bill imposes a license requirement and fee of $1 per barrel upon any entity engaged in the commercial lightering of petroleum products on waters within the territorial jurisdiction of this State.

Thursday, June 19, 2014

Buck-A-Barrel Oil Lightering Bill Back In The General Assembly!



(Audubon's Dave Carter presenting Vic Singer with his own personal Soap Box)

Vic Singer has been on this soap box for nearly a decade.....
CIVIC LEAGUE FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY RESOLUTION
WHEREAS: Governor Minner has proposed a 5 cent per gallon additional tax on gasoline sold in Delaware, starting on September 1, 2007; and
WHEREAS: The Controller General's Office has projected estimated revenues from such a tax at $23.4 million in FY 2008 and $28.6 million in FY 2009; and
WHEREAS: The Great Stone Anchorage in the Delaware Bay is reputedly the only sheltered east coast port between Maine and Texas capable of accommodating oil tankers with drafts as large as 55 feet; and
WHEREAS: Lightering of such tankers - - transfer of bulk product to barges or tankers of lesser draft to deliver product to refineries on the Delaware River and elsewhere on the eastern seaboard - - has been ongoing at the Great Stone Anchorage since before the June 28, 1971 effective date of Delaware's Coastal Zone Act (CZA); and
WHEREAS: Corporate entities involved in such lightering have never been granted CZA permits, and only one such entity (Maritrans) has been granted an Air Quality permit covering the activity; and
WHEREAS: In 2005, Maritrans requested an increase in the maximum amount of lightering permissible under its Air Quality permit(1) beyond the 100 million barrel ceiling (12 month rolling average basis) then permissible; and
WHEREAS: Imposing a $1 per barrel tax on oil lightered at Great Stone Anchorage would produce revenues in the neighborhood of $100 million per year; and
WHEREAS: Since a barrel of crude oil produces about 26 gallons of gasoline (along with other hydrocarbons), a $1 per barrel tax on lightered oil would have an impact on the price of gasoline no larger than 4 cents per gallon; and
WHEREAS: Because the revenues from such a tax would be spread over more than just Delaware, a tax of $1 per barrel of oil (less than 4 cents/gallon on gasoline) would produce more than three times as much Delaware revenue as the 5 cent per gallon additional tax proposed by Governor Minner.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED BY CIVIC LEAGUE FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY THAT
A tax no smaller than $1 per barrel of oil lightered at Great Stone Anchorage in the Delaware Bay be imposed with an effective date no later than September 1, 2007 and that the first $1 per barrel of such revenue be earmarked for Delaware's Transportation Trust Fund.
ADOPTED (in concept) without dissent
General Membership Meeting of May 15, 2007
Attest: _________________
...the oil lightering proposal had now been introduced for the third time....
HB 418 - AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 30 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO STATE TAXES AND VESSEL-TO-VESSEL TRANSFERS OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS - This bill imposes a license requirement and fee of $1 per barrel upon any entity engaged in the commercial lightering of petroleum products on waters within the territorial jurisdiction of this State.
 So far HB 418 - the lightering bill filed yesterday - is MIA in  mainstream news. But word is out about a road revenue "compromise". WDEL AP and (News Journal) Jonathan Starkey are breaking the news of the Deal to raise weekend Del. 1 tolls
Members of Gov. Jack Markell's administration and lawmakers have reached a compromise to raise weekend tolls on Del. 1 from $2 to $3 and authorize $20 million in new debt to pay for road maintenance projects.  The agreement replaces a more ambitious effort by Markell to raise Delaware's per-gallon gasoline tax by 10 cents and authorize new debt to fund $100 million in new projects annually. The higher tolls will raise about $10 million annually, with the majority of that money restoring proposed cuts to Community Transportation Fund accounts that lawmakers use to fund hometown road projects. Lawmakers fiercely protect the accounts to fix roads and curry favor in their districts. The $20 million in debt, far lower than what the administration pushed for, will pay for paving projects. "We need more revenue," Transportation Secretary Shailen Bhatt told lawmakers. "You can't solve this problem with borrowing alone."
........The capital budget committee voted 11-1 to approve the higher tolls and new debt. Only Sen. Colin Bonini, R-Dover South, dissented. "I'm not thrilled about raising tolls," Bonini said. The committee's vote was a formality, as Bhatt had the authority to raise tolls without agreement of the General Assembly. But administration officials did not want to take the step to raise tolls unilaterally and lawmakers agreed to provide support. "It's our understanding as a department that there is no legislative vote that is necessary," Bhatt told lawmakers. "However we didn't want to just come in on July 1 and say we have this avenue, we wanted to take it. It's something we wanted to have full transparency on."
See related story Prospects bleak for Markell's revenue proposals

Monday, June 16, 2014

Candidate Forum For Recorder Of Deeds, State Treasurer And State Auditor And Civic League Elections - 7PM Tomorrow Night In New Castle

 


CIVIC LEAGUE FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
Bill Dunn, President
 
Candidate Forum for
Recorder of Deeds, State Treasurer 
and State Auditor
and
Civic League Elections

Tuesday
June 17, 2014
at 7:00 PM

at the Paul J. Sweeney
Public Safety Building

3601 N. DuPont Hwy
(Route 13)
New Castle, DE