Update: FYI Attending via ZOOM precludes participants from joining the Q&A portion of the meetings [Find links to materials HERE]
New Castle County Deptartment of Land Use:
NCC2050 Meeting with Land Use
7 - 9 p.m. Wednesday, April 27th
NCC Gilliam Building
Multi Purpose Conference Room
67 Reads Way, New Castle, DE 19720
REGISTER HERE
The April 27 Information Session will feature the following topics:
- Historic Preservation
- Conservation
- Open Space and Recreation
- Climate Change and Hazard Mitigation
- Utilities, Water, and Sewer
For the best experience, please plan to attend this event in person where you will be able to interact with Land Use Staff who will answer questions and receive your feedback on the specific topics presented.
This event will also be broadcast live on Zoom. The Zoom meeting link will be posted to the Dept. of Land Use website on the day of the event. Those watching online are asked to submit any feedback via email to: NCC2050@newcastlede.gov.
Also, if you haven't heard about this issue, you will want to. I am posting more on it soon.
READ AND SIGN THIS PETITION: Scott Run Commerce Center Warehouses Petition Letter
CALL TO ACTION! The Scott Run Commerce Center plans for the 301/Jameson Corner Road area now include larger warehousing with more 18-wheeler bays than initially communicated to the public years ago. This will negatively impact pedestrian safety, traffic, and community character in MOT for years to come. BY THE END OF APRIL please submit your concerns to LandUse@newcastlede.gov and members of the NCC Council (https://nccde.org/226/County-Council). Not sure what concerns to write about? You can either watch this 27 minute overview from our neighbors Erin Kaplan Ari Kaplan and Kevin Caneco , or you can read more information about the plans on the NCC website for project #20200066 http://www3.nccde.org/project/details/default.aspx...
NCC2050 Meeting with Land Use
7 - 9 p.m. Thursday, April 21st
NCC Gilliam Building
Multi Purpose Conference Room
67 Reads Way, New Castle, DE 19720
REGISTER HERE
Join us to learn what's in the NCC2050 Comprehensive Plan!
Tonight's Information Session will feature the following topics:
- Mobility
- Housing
- Community Planning and Design
- Economic and Community Development
- Environmental and Social Justice
- Intergovernmental Coordination
For the best experience, please plan to attend this event in person where you will be able to interact with Land Use Staff who will answer questions and receive your feedback on the specific topics presented.
This event will also be broadcast live on Zoom. The Zoom meeting link will be posted to the Dept. of Land Use website on the day of the event. Those watching online are asked to submit any feedback via email to: NCC2050@newcastlede.gov.
If you are not able to attend this meeting, no worries! The video recording will be posted on the NCC2050 website.
A second Information Session will be held on April 27 and will feature the following topics:
- Historic Preservation
- Conservation
- Open Space and Recreation
- Climate Change and Hazard Mitigation
- Utilities, Water, and Sewer
Please register for the April 27 event here.
And from the MOT Alliance, the citizens' group representing the area under NCC's "future growth zone"
Dept of Land Use formal response to MOT Alliance requests for change to the NCC2050 comprehensive plan.
From Rich Hall, manager of Dept of Land Use: FYI – we posted a “save the date” notice today for two sessions on the NCC2050. The dates are April 21st and 27th. They will be in the Multipurpose Room at the Gilliam Building and will be in the evening.
Just 3 thoughts (this is Melissa writing her own thoughts, not necessarily representing all 1,100 of us), interested to hear what others think:
(1) They have added a "recommendation" to "consider" changes to S zoning.
Melissa's Response: I would like a plan and a commitment to execute upon it that is more definitive than a recommendation to “consider”. Given our area has been identified as the growth area for the last 20 years, and given that NCC2050 establishes a plan for the next 30 years, any zoning changes should be concurrent with or prior to enacting a 30-year plan that sets policy for such zoned areas.
(2) Our preference for development style (from our 777 person survey representing more than 1% of MOT) is categorized as "growing pains" and assumed that we are "supporting segregation of housing types" which will result in an "exacerbation of existing inequity".
Melissa's Response: MOT Alliance represents RESPONSIBLE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, with our #1 principle being COMMUNITY. I believe community is not only fellowship, but also a physical place where ALL residents can gather that is respectful of ALL residents. Therefore:
1 - Housing for residents that have restricted mobility (e.g. seniors, students, underserved populations) should enable the best ease of access to those places of gathering. I'd like to see that planned (i.e. S zoning changes).
2 - Affordable housing should be proximal to support services to enable underserved populations to have an equitable quality of life. I'd like to see that planned (i.e. S zoning changes).
3 - It is irresponsible to build residential homes – regardless of style – in places with insufficient infrastructure. The Dept of Land Use response on the insufficient infrastructure is that they will continue to “work with” other governing bodies (re: our school concerns), “monitor” (re: our EMS/Fire/Police concerns), and defer to addressing additional concerns legislatively (i.e. not do anything). I believe this approach is contrary to the mission of MOT Alliance, and I'd like to see better planning than "work with" "monitor" and defer.
4 - Lastly, I personally am disheartened that they misinterpreted our survey to mean we want segregation of housing types. I think the fact we prefer single family homes over multifamily could also mean we want more single family homes that are affordable, more mixed use developments with a larger percentage of single family than multifamily, or any other possible interpretation. I encourage the Land Use department to better understand our position before making inflammatory accusations.
(3) Our request to reduce residential growth until infrastructure increases is denied, and misinterpreted as a request to stop development.
Melissa's response: We represent Responsible Growth and Development; even the terms "growth" and "development" are in our mission statement. Some residents may want to stop growth altogether, but we -- the majority of our group, and the MOT Alliance committee -- believe in our unifying mission FOR RESPONSIBLE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT. I'd like Land Use to respond to our request to REDUCE residential growth.
.png)
.jpg)
