(image)
From Nancy Willing -
NCC is upset that residents are pointing out possible worst case examples after examining the proposed Ord. 19-005.
We were called out on March 1st by Meyer's Land Use Dept. GM for "misleading people" through having "inaccurately painted the draft ordinance in such a negative light." saying, "Every point in your summary is false"; "alarmist language" etc..
But the NCC Planning Board recently argued many of our EXACT same points, as led by former state Senator Karen Peterson.
And now Meyer et. al. feel perfectly comfortable dismissing Karen Peterson's concerns just as they dismissed ours.
Please ask your council member if they will also dismiss these concerns when considering to vote for this ordinance as it is currently drafted or will they study these concerns and address them?
Listen to the Planning Board discussion and vote HERE
The image above is from our collaborative community facebook site on the proposed transportation NCC Ordinance 19.005 with this post by R.J. Miles:
Will the 202 corridor look like this in 2050?
Land use protection to the west and a free for all to the east?
Is NCC laying the foundation for dramatic disparity in land use policy, honoring some constituencies concerns with specific protections in the UDC/Comp Plan, while sacraficing the concerns of others by removing current protections?







